Showing posts with label Audrey Hepburn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Audrey Hepburn. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

My Fair Lady (1964): Shira's Take

I think this is the first time I've watched a best picture winner in the context of this project and disagreed with my former opinion. I had ranked this movie from the hundreds of times I'd seen it in the past 5 stars, the equivalent of 10/10, on Flixter. My opinion is slightly changed.

Audrey Hepburn and Rex Harrison have absolutely some of my favorite onscreen chemistry ever. They have a Benedick and Beatrice thing going on. I'm not saying that Eliza ultimately should have returned to the ungrateful, obnoxious Henry. I'm just saying I like how much they hate each other, and I like how much they secretly love each other. Another positive--subtle, interesting choreography (my favorite being in the horse races scene). This pairs with wide, swooping photography to make for a big, beautiful musical film. The costumes (designed by Cecil Beaton, who also did fabulous costumes for the otherwise awful Gigi) are astonishing. I mentioned to Eitan at one point: "If I owned ANY dress in this entire movie, I would wear it every day for the rest of my life." And since we're talking musical here, I have to mention the songs. Every single song is a hit. Not all songs are necessary in terms of plot ("Get Me to the Church on Time", "I'm an Ordinary Man", etc.), but they are all catchy and enjoyable with great lyrics.

Now to get to why I've changed my rating of this movie since the last time I saw it. There are extremely boring patches, and they really should have been edited out. I'm sorry, but this movie could be 2.5 hours long and not lose ANYTHING. The story drags right in the beginning (before Eliza goes to Henry's house), in slight patches throughout, and especially after the ball scene. It seems that many scenes could be shortened by about a minute or two, as well. But it definitely has to be said that I really appreciate the ending. It is an intriguing ending for a love story, and I actually think it had a lot of influence on the less conventional films of the late 60's and early 70's (The Graduate, for one, in its uncertain ending). All we know is that Eliza and Henry care about each other and embrace each other's obnoxious habits, based on Eliza's smiling at Henry's rudeness. I doubt that the filmmakers intended to imply that Eliza and Henry would get married. Indeed, I think they and the Colonel would end up three bachelors, as Henry hypothesized. Charming, and interesting. 9/10

My Fair Lady (1964): Eitan's Take

I had forgotten how damned annoying Audrey Hepburn is for the first 45 minutes of My Fair Lady. Stomping, shrieking, growling, and yelping, she almost threatens to derail the entirely gorgeous affair. The fact that this film is, in spite of that early performance, so utterly charming, fulfilling, and likable is a testament to the working-overtime magnificence of it all. The shimmering costume design and orchestration, the soulful performance by Rex Harrison, and the meticulous design and direction make for a really wonderful affair. Technically, the film is a complete masterpiece; one only needs to watch the truly awesome "day at the races" sequence to get a feel for how much director George Cukor cares about every detail of the production. It's certainly the best musical about linguistics ever made.

I know that the film is an adaptation of a musical, which in turn was an adaptation of George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion, so I can't exactly comment on the film's plot and content -- almost none of it is original. But I noticed some things tonight that I had never paid attention to before. First, coming just a few years after West Side Story (which, as you may recall, I pooh-poohed with glee), it's truly great to watch a musical that has deeply flawed and complicated characters. The relationship between Higgins and Doolittle starts as you might expect, and we watch with admiration as the eloquent but abrasive professor works wonders on the dirty street scoundrel. But over time, as Higgins' true nature (possessive as all hell, putting the "My" in "My Fair Lady") emerges, the film takes on rather tragic tones, as complex personalities collide. The simplicity of the subplots (Freddy's voyeurism, Eliza's father's tongue-in-cheek transformation) serves as a contrast to the epic clash between Eliza's growing sense of maturity and independence and Higgins' overpowering chauvinism and control-freak approach. When the film aims for some proto-feminist themes, it comes off slightly awkward, but more often than not we get what social ideas are at stake in Eliza's makeover.

One more thing: despite some truly inventive artistic direction, there are many parts of this film that simply do not escape their roots on the stage. For example, "gritty" downtown London is a victim of preposterous design. Tom Jones was a bleak and muddy affair, but at least its peasant London actually looked dirty.

I saw My Fair Lady for the last time nearly half my life ago, and it remains a stunning, unusually complicated piece of work. It's not my favorite musical to ever win Best Picture (Chicago, of course...) but it comes close. I remembered it being a 10-level masterpiece, but my early anger with Hepburn's screechy, ear-splitting performance brought it down to -- gasp! -- a 9. Lovely film.